a demonstration of control
So I received a copy of a motion filed with the court by my EH. In it he, or rather his attorney, tells the court that I inappropriately removed my DD2 from school on 2 days in March. He also alleges that I refused to sign paperwork related to my daughter’s health insurance.
Both of these are not only false, but my EH knew they were false.
First, the health insurance documents they are referring to
in this ruling had to do with life insurance (not health insurance)
beneficiaries (specifically me signing over my spousal beneficiary status
which I won’t do) and paperwork for EH to sign me up for life insurance through
his employer that had inaccurate medical information for me. I did say that if EH
provided a blank form I would fill it out, but I never received a blank
form. But I will not submit inaccurate medical information to a life insurance
company, so I won’t sign that form until it’s corrected.
Neither of these had anything to do with DD2’s health
insurance. If there were any other documents from EH’s benefits I
am not aware of them, but at no time was I asked to sign anything
regarding DD2’s health insurance coverage by any individual.
Second, the 2 days they are referring to in this ruling I
did not pull DD2 out of school. I picked her up after her school day was
over (at 1100am) and pulled her out of her after school child care program
during my scheduled custodial days, which is my right.
EH did not like that the custodial days changed (see my
previous posts regarding this subject) and he attempted to circumvent my
custodial days by picking her up on those two afternoons at the end of her day
care hours. These are also the days that he filed a violation of his
order of protection with the police due to my speaking to him about custodial
matters and that he sent officers to my house because he wanted me to be in violation
of the custody orders (which I wasn’t). None of these were violations,
merely EH’s attempt to harass me and to control the entire situation.
At the very least this is a bogus and false filing.
And EH’s attempt to make me look like a bad parent. Right along with
using his order of protection as a weapon against me and his overall refusal to
work with me.
I am now in the position of being unable to speak to him at
all regarding custodial matters because he will call the police for a violation
of his protection order, even though these are clearly protected
communications, not only for my protection order but for his. I have
now supposedly been in violation of his orders because I initiated conversation
about parenting time and DD2’s after school day care arrangements. I simply
told EH that I would be unable to pay for daycare for the month of April
so DD2 would be pulled out of the program on 4/1. He tried to tell me
that she needed to be in there and threatened legal action if I pulled her
out.
I merely pointed out that I could not pay for it, and the company
would discharge her for non-payment per the contract and that if he wanted her
to stay in the program he needed to make arrangements with the company to pay
for it. I have been paying for it since August, without any assistance
from him, despite him making more than 2x the amount that I do, and me asking
repeatedly for assistance for a program that he insisted that she attend.
Both of these communications are protected and have been
closed by PD as a non-issue.
And yes, I have a protection order against him for me and my
older daughter because those were initiated when I filed rape charges for EH
raping me and inappropriate behavior towards my older daughter (which EH conveniently
admitted to under oath during our first hearing). I however have
attempted to work with EH as specified in the orders to make sure that DD2 is
taken care of. That clearly is not working out well.
The fact that I did not pull DD2 out of school and
that there were no documents regarding DD2’s health insurance make the very
existence of this motion to be based on known false information. At the
very minimum, EH knew that these were false and either did not tell his
attorney, or his attorney is willing to file motions based on false
information. I have the strings of emails that prove that not only are
they false allegations, but that EH was well aware of them being false.
Which means he is willing to lie to the courts to get what he wants, and his
attorney is willing to assist him, knowingly or unknowingly.
Calendar
M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | |||||
3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |
17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 |
24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 |
Leave a Reply